Called Atalarik Syach Hinder the Desire of Children to Go Abroad, This is Tsania Marwa's Response

Kapanlagi.com - Tsania Marwa speaks out about the statement made by her ex-husband, Atalarik Syach who claimed that she hindered the children's desire to go abroad and refused to sign the permission letter to make their passports.

Herdiyan Saksono, Tsania Marwa's legal representative, said that people should not underestimate the fact that his client did not give permission and refused to sign the permission letter.

This is because, based on the court's decision, the custody of the children is in Tsania's hands. However, it is known that the upbringing has been under her ex-husband's control.

1. Emphasize Tsania Marwa as the Custodian of the Child

instagram.com/tsaniamarwa54

"The fact is, my client Tsania Marwa is their mother. Then, in the court decision, it is also clear that my client is the custodian or the one who has the legal right to take care of the child," said Herdiyan Saksono in the Duren Sawit area, East Jakarta, on Saturday (12/8).

"You (Atalarik) already know that you don't have the right, but you insist that his mother must be spoken to nicely," Herdiyan added.

2. No Good Faith

Therefore, Herdiyan believes that Atalarik should show good faith first by communicating and taking care of their child together. Instead of suddenly taking the child and asking Tsania for permission by signing a permission letter to make a passport.

"If you want to take them abroad, wait first. You must talk nicely, take care of them together nicely. Only then can you take the child abroad. But the information we received is that there hasn't been good communication with the mother, they just want to overlap and take the child for umrah abroad," he said.

3. Summons from Atalarik Syach

Regarding Atalarik's intention to send a summons if Tsania does not have good intentions, Tsania's side feels confused if the summons is actually sent. However, Atalarik must remember that the custody rights actually belong to Tsania.

"Summons is a right. If you want to send a summons, don't threaten or create drama. If you want to send a summons, just send it. But please, this person you want to send the letter to is the person you want to ask permission for the happiness of your child," he explained.

"In my opinion, considering this situation, reconciliation should be mandatory for the sake of the child's interest. As for the father who, in fact, knows he has no rights in custody, he is being stubborn when it is executed. This is not about winning or losing, this is for the child," Herdiyan concluded.

(kpl/aal/sry)