Finally Revealed, the Complete Chronology of the Case that Made Adam Deni Have to Stay in Jail

Kapanlagi.com - It turns out that Adam Deni Gearaka, together with Ni Made Dwita Anggari, has been charged with transmitting or transferring other people's electronic documents that are confidential. In a trial held at the North Jakarta District Court on Monday (14/3), the prosecutor finally revealed the initial chronology of the transfer of Ahmad Sahroni's confidential documents.

In the indictment, the prosecutor first revealed that Ni Made is a private employee who runs a bicycle spare part sales business sold on the @exitdenmark account, which is also very good friends with Adam Deni until he became the admin of the @thenewbikingregetan account. The bicycles sold through Ni Made's Instagram account apparently caught the attention of the Deputy Chairman of Commission III of the Indonesian House of Representatives.

1. Bicycle Sales

"Starting from the friendship between the defendants Ni Made Dwita Anggari and Adam Deni Gearakan since February 2016 until August 2018. Then between the defendant Ni Made Dwita Anggari and the victim Ahmad Sahroni, they have conducted several bicycle sales transactions, including: two bicycles that the victim has paid off in 2020, namely: one Firefly brand bicycle priced at Rp.450,000,000,- and one Bastion brand bicycle priced at Rp.378,000,000,- but Ni Made Dwita Anggari has not yet delivered the goods to the victim," said the prosecutor in the trial.

The bicycle sales transaction between Ni Made and Ahmad Sahroni is personal data, and of course all ordering documents are held by Ni Made Dwita. After that, on Wednesday, January 26, Ni Made suddenly contacted Adam Deni via a short message on the messaging application and sent a photo containing Ahmad Sahroni's personal purchase data.

2. Personal Data

Kapanlagi/Bayu Herdianto

"Communication and bike sales transactions between the defendant Ni Made Dwita Anggari and the victim Ahmad Sahroni, which is the personal data in question, are recorded in the ordering documents held by Ni Made Dwita Anggari. Furthermore, on Wednesday, January 26, 2022, at around 3:29 AM WIB, the defendant Ni Made Dwita Anggari contacted the defendant Adam Deni Gearaka via the WhatsApp application, and sent a photo containing personal information belonging to the victim Ahmad Sahroni in the form of personal information about the purchase of bikes and spare parts between Ahmad Sahroni and Ni Made Dwita Anggari," said the prosecutor.

Not only that, the prosecutor also revealed Ni Made's intention to send the bike purchase documents in Ahmad Sahroni's name to Adam Deni because she was disappointed and upset with Ahmad Sahroni who still owed payment for the bike and spare parts. Therefore, the prosecutor also revealed the expensive bike that Ahmad Sahroni had not yet paid off, namely the ASC worth Rp 500 million.

3. Upload Document

"At that time, she also informed her purpose was because the defendant Ni Made Dwita Anggari felt disappointed and hurt by the victim Ahmad Sahroni because according to the defendant Ni Made Dwita Anggari, there were still outstanding payments for the purchase of bicycles and spare parts by the victim Ahmad Sahroni that had not been paid in full," said the prosecutor.

In addition, on January 26, Adam Deni then uploaded the purchase document of Ahmad Sahroni's bicycle to his Instastory. In the post, the prosecutor said Adam Deni wrote a sentence explaining that the document from Ahmad Sahroni was ready to be submitted to the KPK.

4. Posted on Instastory

"On Wednesday, January 26, 2022, at around 6:41 PM WIB, the defendant Adam Deni Gearaka uploaded information and electronic documents containing the personal life and data of the victim Ahmad Sahroni on Instagram story, also known as Instastory, which is an electronic system with a feature that allows the public to show their current activities, share stories, or music they are currently listening to, where everyone who views the Instagram Story will be recorded by Instagram so that the public can know who has viewed the information or electronic documents," he concluded.

In this case, Adam Deni and Ni Made were charged with Article 48 Paragraph (3) jo Article 32 Paragraph (3) of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended and supplemented by the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning the amendment of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Jo Article 55 Paragraph (1) ke-1 KUHP Subsider Article 48 Paragraph (2) jo Article 32 Paragraph (2) and more subsider Article 48 Paragraph (1) jo Article 32 Paragraph (1).

(kpl/irf/frs)