Nikita Mirzani Smiles Brightly, Expert Witness States Police Report Should Not Be Valid

Initially, Nikita's legal team presented the chronology of communication between Nikita's assistant, Mail, and the reporter, Reza Gladys. In that communication, the amount of Rp 4 billion emerged, which then became the basis for the extortion report.

When asked by the legal counsel whether the conversation could be considered an agreement, Dr. Subani actually provided a stronger answer. According to him, it was no longer just an agreement.

"It is not an agreement, but has already been realized. Because the money has been sent through an agreement," said Dr. Subani.

This statement seems to strengthen Nikita's position that the money sent is part of a realization of cooperation, not the result of extortion. The expert also emphasized that in civil law, oral agreements are already considered valid.

"Because in the civil law, if there is a conversation that results in an agreement, it is already official. It's the same as when I buy cigarettes and then I pay, that is already an agreement even if it is not written," explained Subani.

However, the peak of the testimony that made Nikita smile with satisfaction was when she was given the opportunity to ask directly. The mother of three asked about who should be entitled to file a police report in cases involving a product.

Dr. Subani firmly stated that the report should be made by the company entity, not an individual.

"In civil law, the one who should file the report is the company, not one of the board of directors or shareholders. The report must be made by the skincare company," said Subani.

Suddenly, this answer made Nikita Mirzani smile widely. This testimony has great potential to weaken, even dismiss the police report filed by Reza Gladys personally against her.

As is known, Nikita Mirzani was reported for alleged extortion of IDR 4 billion related to a skincare business. This expert testimony is a 'breath of fresh air' for Nikita in her struggle in court.