Reza Gladys emphasizes that the Controversial Issue of GLAFIDSYA Products is Not Dangerous

Kapanlagi.com - The controversy surrounding beauty products is heating up again and dragging the name of the Glafidsya Brand. In response to the circulating issues, Glafidsya's Legal Advisor, Julianus Paulus Sembiring, S.Pd, S.H, emphasized that GLAFIDSYA products are not dangerous

This clarification is important after the distribution permit for the South Korean product, RIBESKIN Superficial Pink Aging, was officially revoked by the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM). This product was known to have been used as one of the components in treatment procedures at the Glafidsya clinic.

Glafidsya's Legal Advisor emphasized that the product does not belong to Glafidsya. Glafidsya is one of many beauty clinics that legally used these imported products in their time.

1. Officially Documented

"It should be noted and understood that RIBESKIN Superficial Pink is not a product of Glafidsya. It is a product from South Korea, and it is not only Reza Gladys who uses it. Many other beauty clinics also use this product," he said when contacted by the media on Monday (4/8/2025).

The purchase of RIBESKIN was officially made in July 2023 from a licensed distributor, complete with invoice proof and valid BPOM and Ministry of Health permits at that time.

The product was used in a treatment called Glowing Booster Cell, which was conducted under the supervision of a professional doctor, not a skincare product sold freely to consumers. All actions were also officially documented with the standard operating procedures implemented at Glafidsya Clinic.

2. Temporarily Stopped Completely

Reza Gladys © KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso

Glafidsya also acknowledged that it had completely halted all treatment activities using the product since May 2024. This decision was made long before BPOM announced the revocation of RIBESKIN's distribution permit in November 2024.

This issue resurfaced after being highlighted in a trial involving Nikita Mirzani. Glafidsya's legal counsel emphasized that there are indications of opinion manipulation aimed at cornering Glafidsya, considering there have been no reports of mass skin damage related to the product.

3. No Report

"Thirdly, there are no reports of mass skin damage, no involvement from KPAI, and also no related criminal cases. However, media coverage seems to lead public opinion to blame Reza Gladys and Klinik Glafidsya," he emphasized.

Reza confirmed that not a single product under the Glafidsya brand is listed among the dangerous products released by BPOM. This clarification is expected to correct the information and restore public trust in the clinic.

(kpl/aal/tdr)