Home Video Menu
Home Prev Next Menu
Better experience in portrait mode.
Rully Anggi Akbar, Boiyen's Husband, Challenged to Prove the 'Shared Loss' Clause

Rully Anggi Akbar, Boiyen's Husband, Challenged to Prove the 'Shared Loss' Clause

Celebrity Activities

kapanlagi
Swipe Up to See the Photos
Rully Anggi Akbar, Boiyen's Husband, Challenged to Prove the 'Shared Loss' Clause

One of the defense points of Rully Anggi Akbar (RAA), who is the husband of Boiyen, in his clarification is the existence of an investment agreement clause stating the principle of "shared profit, shared loss". However, this is strongly denied by the reporter, Rio, and his legal counsel.

They challenge Rully to show where that clause is located in the agreement document. Santo Nababan, as the legal counsel, emphasizes that in the agreement they hold, there is no sentence stating that losses are shared.

Read other news about Boiyen on Liputan6.com, come on! If not now, when?

<nil>

On the contrary, Santo Nababan stated that there is indeed a point that guarantees a certain nominal payment each month to investors, regardless of the company's profit condition.

<nil>

"Well, we asked the legal counsel accompanying us to show the article, which article and which paragraph. Because we also have that agreement. You see. We have read all of this, we have understood all of this, and we did not find any language or sentence that states shared profits or shared losses. There is none," he said when met in the Tebet area, South Jakarta, Thursday (15/01/2026).

<nil>

According to Santo, the logic of "shared losses" contradicts the existence of a guaranteed monthly nominal stated in the contract. Rio as the investor explained that in the initial proposal, a minimum profit of Rp 6 million per month was promised.

<nil>

"What is here? Here it is stated that the concerned party RAA guarantees a nominal value of 6 million per month. Now if there is a talk of shared profits and shared losses, why is there a nominal value? That's the thing. So it doesn't make sense," added Santo.

<nil>

Rio himself admitted to having received profit-sharing payments only four times with a nominal amount of around Rp 6 million. After that, the payments stalled and Rully became difficult to contact. The total losses suffered by Rio are estimated to reach Rp 300 million to Rp 400 million if calculated based on the promised profits during the contract period.

<nil>

"So the 200 million was communicated directly for the first time. This 200 million includes RAA's promises of a nominal value of 6 million per month. Yes. 24 months if the contract is for 2 years," explained Santo detailing the calculation of the losses.

<nil>

The reporter requests Rully to stop making misleading statements to the public and focus on fulfilling his obligations. If the "joint loss" clause indeed does not exist, then Rully's defense argument is considered invalid and further strengthens the suspicion of fraud.

Ammar Zoni Speaks Out About the Acknowledgment Letter in the Drug Case, Claims He Was Directed by the Prison Authorities

Ammar Zoni Speaks Out About the Acknowledgment Letter in the Drug Case, Claims He Was Directed by the Prison Authorities

Actor Ammar Zoni is back in court for a follow-up hearing regarding the alleged drug trafficking case that ensnared him. He provided an explanation regarding the background of the creation of the letter, which he claims was not purely his personal initiative. Read more about it below!

READ MORE icon-hand
Ammar Zoni Speaks Out About the Acknowledgment Letter in the Drug Case, Claims He Was Directed by the Prison Authorities