The Consequences of Extorting DWP Audience, AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia Dismissed Unceremoniously

Kapanlagi.com - The extortion case that shook the Djakarta Warehouse Project (DWP) 2024 music event ended with the unceremonious dismissal of AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia. This shocking decision was made during the Polri Code of Ethics Commission (KKEP) hearing held at the National Police Headquarters in Jakarta, early January 2025.

This story began when Malvino allegedly asked for money from a Malaysian citizen during the concert, an action that clearly violated ethics and demonstrated an abuse of authority within the Polri. This case also triggered an intensive legal process, drawing public attention to the integrity of law enforcement officials.

In response to the dismissal, Malvino did not remain silent. He has filed an appeal against the decision, indicating that this drama is not yet fully over. Check out more information summarized by Kapanlagi.com from various sources, Friday (3/1).

1. Starting from Asking for Money from Malaysian Citizens

This shocking case began when Malvino Edward Yusticia, who was then serving as the Head of Subdirectorate III of the Narcotics Directorate of the Metro Jaya Police, conducted an inspection of a Malaysian citizen amidst the festivities of DWP 2024.

The event, which took place from December 13 to 15, 2024, garnered attention after allegations of drug abuse surfaced, and more surprisingly, Malvino was accused of soliciting a bribe to release the citizen being inspected.

Reports of this corruption practice reached the ears of the Propam Division of the National Police, which immediately conducted a thorough investigation. As a result, Malvino had to face an ethical examination that took place from December 27, 2024, to January 2, 2025, where he was found guilty and sentenced to dismissal without honor.

"The administrative sanction in the form of dismissal without honor or PTDH as a member of the National Police," revealed Brigadier General Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko at the TNCC Building of the National Police Headquarters in Jakarta on Thursday (1/2), as reported by ANTARA.

2. Ethics Hearing Process and Dismissal Decision

The Police Code of Ethics Commission (KKEP) hearing held at the National Police Headquarters took place from December 31, 2024, to January 2, 2025, with the presence of representatives from the National Police Commission (Kompolnas) to ensure transparency and accountability in the legal process.

In this tense hearing, the panel of judges carefully examined various pieces of evidence and conflicting witness testimonies, causing the process to take quite a long time.

After a thorough review of the existing facts, it was ultimately revealed that Malvino was found guilty of violating police ethics, including Article 13 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 1 of 2003 and several articles in Police Regulation Number 7 of 2022.

3. Reactions and Appeals Against the Dismissal Decision

After receiving the shocking news of his dismissal, Malvino Edward Yusticia did not remain silent and prepared to file an appeal. Hoping to receive a lighter decision or even to overturn the dismissal, he stepped forward to follow the internal legal procedures of the police, which involve a review by the Appeals Commission.

This process will re-examine all the facts presented during the first trial. However, it is important to note that this appeal does not halt the enforcement of the interim dismissal decision that has been in effect since early January 2025.

"The two individuals who were dismissed filed an appeal," said Muhammad Choirul Anam, a member of the National Police Commission (Kompolnas).

4. Implications of the Case for the Police and Ethical Enforcement

This case raises awareness of the need for strict supervision of the integrity of police members, especially in units dealing with drugs. The dismissal of Malvino serves as a clear signal that the abuse of power will never be tolerated within the police force.

This ethical trial reflects the police's commitment to enhancing accountability, where the investigation process involving witnesses from both inside and outside the agency is believed to be capable of rebuilding public trust.

Furthermore, this transparent accountability mechanism serves as a model for other agencies regarding the importance of swift and decisive action in responding to ethical violations.

5. Not Wanting Similar Cases to Occur in the Future

The police are now increasingly serious about maintaining the integrity of their members by strengthening the internal supervision system, including expanding the role of the Propam Division to monitor members' behavior in the field.

With this strategic step, it is hoped that potential violations can be detected earlier, thus preventing unwanted cases.

In addition, the enhancement of training on professional ethics and integrity is expected to instill discipline and a strong sense of responsibility among members.

Not only that, collaboration with the National Police Commission and other independent agencies is also being strengthened to ensure transparency in every investigation and enforcement process conducted.

6. Why was AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia dismissed from the National Police?

AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia had to relinquish his position in the National Police after being entangled in a blackmail case that tarnished the institution's reputation. He was proven to have committed an unworthy act by extorting attendees of DWP 2024 while on duty to secure the event.

7. What is an ethical hearing in the National Police?

An ethical hearing is an important mechanism within the National Police, where this process serves to evaluate and assess disciplinary violations and the code of ethics committed by its members.

8. Can Malvino Edward Yusticia return as a member of the National Police after being dismissed?

Malvino has the opportunity to file an appeal, but his fate now lies in the hands of the National Police Appeal Commission, which will determine the final decision.

9. What is the impact of this case on the image of the National Police?

This case reveals the urgency to enhance oversight of the behavior of police members, while also emphasizing the importance of their commitment to unwavering integrity.

(kpl/rmt)