Kapanlagi.com - Professional makeup artist, Clerence Victoria, recently made headlines for alleged assault. To clarify the issue, Clerence attended a hearing at the West Jakarta District Court on Monday (19/2).
Accompanied by her legal counsel, Wiradarma Harefa S.H., M.H., the agenda of the hearing was the examination of the victim's witnesses. For information, the case began in November 2021 and in December 2023, it was processed to be examined at the West Jakarta District Court.
"This case has been ongoing since November 2021, and in December 2023, it entered the court. This is the 4th hearing," said Wiradarma to terkenalcoid at the location after the hearing on February 19, 2024.
1. Chronology of Events
Clerence Victoria with her legal counsel (Photo Credit: Personal Documentation)
Furthermore, said Wiradarma Harefa, the chronology of this case began with Clerence's desire to seek clarification from the complainant named AP regarding investment issues and the complainant's statements that led to falsehood, insults, and defamation.
"However, when they arrived at the location, a commotion occurred. The lengthy legal process experienced by Clerence Victoria has caused significant losses to both her business and her reputation," he said.
2. Unsubstantiated Accusations
Clerence Victoria with her legal counsel (Photo Credit: Personal Documentation)
Wiradama Harefa revealed that the informant in this case, based on information from the defendants, is a suspected Affiliate in one of the Robot Trading platforms that has been proven to be a fraudulent investment. Several parties involved in the Robot Trading platform have been named as suspects and have undergone punishment.
Not only that, Wiradama mentioned that SP, the wife of AP, who filed the report, is playing the victim and accusing Clerence Victoria without strong evidence.
"And we see that the informant is portraying themselves as the victim, when in fact our client is the victim of the actions committed by the informant. Therefore, we await the examination results in this public trial. Let's not act as if the informant is the judge, because there is a judge who will examine, adjudicate, and decide on this case. Let's wait," he said.
"We explain that our client (Clerence Victori/defendant 2) was reported with a report of assault. But the fact is that both parties were involved in a fight and hit each other. Furthermore, the informant admitted in their statement that they were hit two or three times by the first defendant, but this is not visible in the CCTV footage," he added.
"Moreover, if we examine the CCTV footage presented as evidence, the victim SP is seen committing more acts of violence towards our client. We counted at least five times they threw and hit any objects on the table blindly towards our client, Clerence Victori, causing injuries to their head and fingers. We will prove this in court," he stated.
3. Statement from Clerence Victoria
Wiradama also explained that Clerence Victoria had previously sought reconciliation and met with the complainant in Bali, there was an agreement for peace, "Our client and the complainant have both signed it. However, the reconciliation efforts were not implemented by the complainant, and instead, the case was brought to court," he said.
Meanwhile, Clerence Victoria, known for her astonishing works in the world of makeup artistry, affirmed that she will continue to fight to clear her name from baseless accusations.
"I believe that justice will prevail, and I will continue to fight to prove my innocence in this case," said Clerence.
As information, this trial will proceed with further examination of witnesses to uncover the truth behind the case.
(kpl/gtr)
Disclaimer: This translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English has been generated by Artificial Intelligence.