Chronology of the Land Dispute Between Atalarik Syach and Dede Tasno, Since 2015 - Ending with Execution

Eka stated that Atalarik does not have a strong legal basis for the ownership of the land. Atalarik's claim to the land is considered unfounded because he lacks material rights."Yes, initially there was indeed a dispute. Our client does not have material rights, but has rights to this land. So, losing his rights to this land. If he wants to use it, it must go through legal efforts in court," he explained.

During the trial process, Atalarik had submitted a sales deed as evidence. However, according to Eka, the document has been declared invalid by the court."The story is indeed long, from 2015 until now, Atalarik's party claims that he has owned this land based on the sales deed. Which we have proven in court, we have also taken legal action, we proved that the AJB was indeed fake," Eka explained.

Eka added that none of the parties in the sale and purchase deed could show valid proof of ownership. This is a strong basis for legally suing Atalarik."The parties in the AJB cannot prove that this land has clear rights or a clear standing regarding this land," he added.

The area of the disputed land also changed in the official measurement documents. Although it was initially recorded as 7,800 square meters, the latest measurement shows only 5,880 square meters."Yes, so the actual area of this land is 7,800 m2 owned by our client based on the 2021 Constructing MAP. This is the latest Plotting MAP, which shows 5,880 m2," he explained.

Eka said that before the execution was carried out, his side had opened a communication space. However, no agreement was reached with Atalarik Syach."Our communication was actually not one-sided. So we, in terms of civil law, tried to achieve a win-win solution first. But up to this moment, there has been no legal certainty regarding what Atalarik wants. Therefore, we are taking execution efforts," he explained.

For almost ten years, Dede Tasno's side has undergone all applicable legal processes. Starting from the first level court, appeal, to judicial review.

"So we did win in... in our civil data we won. There was an appeal, a cassation effort, and a judicial review effort. We have gone through all of it," said Eka.

Eka emphasized that the execution is carried out after there is a final decision from the court. Without that, the court will not carry out the execution.

"Of course, if we submit a request for execution, the decision must be final or have permanent legal force. So the court will not want to carry out execution efforts without a clear legal basis," he concluded.