Home Video Menu
Home Prev Next Menu
Better experience in portrait mode.
Kim Seon Ho After Tax Issues, Process of Closing Personal Company

Kim Seon Ho After Tax Issues, Process of Closing Personal Company

Hot News Korea

kapanlagi
Swipe Up to See the Photos
Kim Seon Ho After Tax Issues, Process of Closing Personal Company

Korean actor Kim Seon Ho expressed his apology after his name was implicated in alleged tax issues related to the management of a personal business entity. The agency also spoke out, explaining the chronology of the establishment and the cessation of operations of the business entity.

Even with an official clarification, this controversy remains a public concern as it emerged during Kim Seon Ho's quite successful acting comeback.

Read the latest news about Kim Seon Ho on Liputan6.com. If not now, When else?

<nil>

Kim Seon Ho publicly apologized for the controversy surrounding his family business, which had raised allegations of tax evasion. He admitted to having a limited understanding of the management details of the business since its establishment.

<nil>

The agency Fantagio issued a second statement to clarify the tax issue and the actor's personal business. They emphasized that there were no contract violations or illegal activities related to Kim Seon Ho's collaboration with the agency.

<nil>

According to the agency, the business was established in January 2024 to support acting activities and theater production. At that time, Kim Seon Ho was still engaged in activities before his new contract with Fantagio began.

<nil>

After joining Fantagio, payment for his fees was made directly to Kim Seon Ho as an individual, not through the business. The operation of the business is said to have ceased for more than a year.

<nil>

Fantagio explained that Kim Seon Ho has paid additional personal income tax on previous earnings. This step was taken as a form of correction as well as tax administration responsibility.

<nil>

Kim Seon Ho is also reported to have returned company cards, vehicles, and stopped paying family salaries from the business entity. This was done to avoid potential public misunderstandings.

<nil>

The issue developed because the business entity was allegedly used to suppress relatively high personal income tax. Some reports even highlighted the use of company funds for non-business needs. The agency acted quickly to provide clarification.