Home Video Menu
Home Prev Next Menu
Better experience in portrait mode.
V BTS Speaks Out About His Name Being Dragged into the Min Hee Jin Trial

V BTS Speaks Out About His Name Being Dragged into the Min Hee Jin Trial

BTS

kapanlagi
Swipe Up to See the Photos
V BTS Speaks Out About His Name Being Dragged into the Min Hee Jin Trial

The name V BTS has also been dragged into the Min Hee Jin trial against HYBE, which is currently in the public spotlight. In the legal process, a KakaoTalk conversation between V and Min Hee Jin was submitted as evidence in court.

V finally spoke out via Instagram Story to clarify the developing situation. The statement was made by V in February 2026 to explain his position of not being involved in the internal conflict.

Read more news about V BTS on Liputan6.com, let’s go! If not now, when?

<nil>

The conversation between V and Min Hee Jin via Kakaotalk was accepted by the court as part of the evidence in the case of Min Hee Jin vs HYBE, thus triggering widespread attention.

<nil>

In the chat, V was mentioned to have responded to the issue of conceptual similarity and said he felt there were parts that looked similar after seeing it directly.

<nil>

Korean media reports quoted V as saying, "There is always discussion about plagiarism... I also saw it and felt, 'It looks similar,'" which then became a hot topic of discussion.

<nil>

Through the Instagram Story on his personal account, V explained that the conversation was just casual talk with an acquaintance and not an official stance in the conflict between Min Hee Jin and HYBE.

<nil>

The owner of the real name Kim Taehyung also claims to be disturbed because the private conversation was submitted as evidence without his prior consent.

<nil>

"Because she (Min Hee Jin) is my acquaintance, I was just sharing empathy, and that was part of our daily private conversation. I had no intention to take sides. However, I am very disturbed because this conversation was presented as evidence without my consent," wrote V.

<nil>

Although not directly involved, V's name was mentioned in the ruling, showing how internal opinions can have a significant impact in the legal realm of the entertainment industry.