Chronology of the Dismissal of AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia Related to the DWP Case, Allegations of Extortion Revealed

Kapanlagi.com - The sensational case of alleged extortion involving AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia during the Djakarta Warehouse Project (DWP) 2024 concert has shaken the public and the police institution. Malvino, who was serving as the Head of Sub-Directorate III of the Narcotics Directorate of the Metro Jaya Police, was found to have violated the code of ethics and was subjected to dismissal without honor (PTDH).

The scandal first emerged when Malvino was reported to have asked for money in exchange for releasing a Malaysian citizen who was detained during a drug examination while the event was ongoing. After a long and exhausting ethical trial process, Malvino was finally declared guilty and dismissed from his position.

This incident has drawn sharp attention to the importance of strict oversight of police members and demonstrates the institution's commitment to taking firm action against any violations of the code of ethics. To better understand the chronology of the case, the ethical trial process, and the impact of the decision on the image of the police, check out the complete information summarized by Kapanlagi.com from various sources, Friday (3/1).

1. Chronology of the Extortion Case at DWP 2024

This shocking case began when the grand DWP concert was held in Jakarta from December 13-15, 2024. Amidst the crowd, AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia, who was serving as the Head of Sub-Directorate III of the Narcotics Directorate of the Metro Jaya Police, was tasked with leading security and checking the audience, including several Malaysian citizens.

However, behind his noble duties, dark allegations emerged: Malvino was suspected of engaging in extortion by demanding a sum of money to release audience members who were detained on suspicion of drug abuse.

This reprehensible action was eventually uncovered after a report was filed with the Propam Division of the National Police, triggering an investigation involving witnesses and evidence that supported the allegations.

As a result, Malvino was found to have violated the police code of ethics and had to face the Police Code of Ethics Commission (KKEP), where severe sanctions in the form of dishonorable dismissal from the police force were imposed.

"We will not tolerate actions like this," said the Head of Public Relations Division of the National Police Brigadier General Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko, referring to ANTARA.

2. Ethics Hearing Process and Dismissal Decision

The Police Code of Ethics Commission Hearing (KKEP) held from December 31, 2024, to January 2, 2025, at the TNCC Building of the National Police Headquarters in Jakarta, attracted public attention with the presence of representatives from the National Police Commission (Kompolnas) who ensured that the process was transparent and accountable.

In this tense hearing, the panel examined evidence and witness testimonies before finally delivering a verdict against Malvino, who was found guilty and sentenced to severe sanctions in the form of dishonorable dismissal (PTDH).

Not only that, but Malvino must also undergo administrative sanctions with placement in a special location for six days, all referring to serious violations of applicable Government Regulations and Police Regulations.

3. Appeal Steps

After receiving the dismissal sanction, AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia did not want to give up easily and chose to file an appeal to challenge the decision. Hoping to receive a lighter punishment or even overturn his dismissal, Malvino stepped forward to request the Appeals Commission to review the facts and evidence revealed in the previous ethics hearing.

However, until the appeal decision is announced, the temporary dismissal status remains in effect, extending the duration of the legal process that Malvino must undergo. This step also serves as a test for the National Police to demonstrate their commitment to maintaining transparency and justice in handling internal violations.

"They are appealing that decision," said Choirul Anam, a member of the National Police Commission (Kompolnas).

4. Impact of the Case on the Police Institution

The dismissal of Malvino has become an important highlight that emphasizes the commitment of the police to uphold the integrity and professionalism of its members. This decisive action is expected to restore public trust, which is often shaken by various cases of abuse of power.

In addition, this incident encourages a comprehensive evaluation of the internal oversight system and security procedures, especially when managing large events that could potentially lead to legal violations.

The police are also determined to tighten the selection and training for their members, ensuring that only those with high integrity are entrusted with strategic positions.

5. Why was AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia dismissed from the police?

AKBP Malvino Edward Yusticia has to face the bitter reality after being dismissed from the police, following the exposure of a case of extortion he committed against DWP 2024 attendees during their drug tests.

6. What is the Polri ethics trial?

The ethics trial is an important step within the Polri, where this process serves to assess and evaluate any violations of the code of ethics committed by its members.

7. Can Malvino return to being a Polri member after being dismissed?

Malvino has filed an appeal, but his fate now lies in the hands of the Polri Appeals Commission, which will determine the next steps.

8. What is the impact of this case on the image of Polri?

This case reflects Polri's strong commitment to upholding the law and strengthening internal oversight to maintain the integrity of the institution.

(kpl/rmt)