Adly Fairuz and Angbeen Rishi Did Not Attend the First Divorce Hearing

Kapanlagi.com - The divorce hearing between celebrities Angbeen Rishi and Adly Fairuz was held again at the South Jakarta Religious Court on Thursday (6/11). However, in this hearing, both Angbeen and Adly were not present in person in the courtroom. They were each represented by their respective legal counsels.

The spokesperson for the South Jakarta Religious Court, Abid, confirmed that the panel of judges has ordered that both principals, the plaintiff and the defendant, must be present at the next hearing scheduled for Wednesday (13/11).

"Oh yes, yes. Regarding that, it was already heard earlier, the representatives were present, but the principals were not. The representatives were ordered to bring the principals, both the plaintiff and the defendant, for mediation on the 13th, so next Wednesday," Abid explained.

1. Plaintiff's Presence is Mandatory

According to Abid, the presence of the plaintiff in this case is a legal obligation. If the plaintiff is absent without a valid reason, the case could have serious consequences.

"For the plaintiff, it is mandatory. The plaintiff is required to attend, and if they do not come without a legally justified reason, there could be consequences for the case," he said.

2. Adly and Angbeen Did Not Attend

The absence of both principals in the first hearing, continued Abid, is not unusual. Usually, in divorce cases, the first hearing is only attended by the legal representatives of each party.

"Eh, because I am not the judge. Yes, it may be that for the first hearing, on average, the principals are indeed not present. So usually, the second hearing is ordered by the panel to have the plaintiff's principal present, and the defendant's legal representative is also instructed to bring the defendant so that they can mediate," he said.

3. There Are Certain Consequences

Abid added that in the case where the plaintiff is absent and not represented, the case can be dismissed. "So if, eh, the plaintiff's side is absent, while they are represented, there are certain consequences. If, eh, they are not using representation, called but absent, the case is dismissed. For the plaintiff, yes; if for the defendant, called but absent, usually twice, it is decided in default," he explained.

4. The Judges Provide Tolerance

However, if the plaintiff uses legal representation, the judges usually still provide tolerance as long as the reason for the absence can be legally justified.

"But if using representation, it is usually ordered that the representative provides a reason for being absent once, and twice provides a necessary reason that can be justified by law, usually it can still be done, but if it is, eh, several times, it can no longer be done, the case can also be dismissed or declared not serious, in NO that," Abid explained.

5. Mediation Agenda in the Next Hearing

For the next hearing, the panel of judges has set the mediation agenda, provided both parties are present in person. "If both are present, then the agenda is mediation," Abid emphasized.

6. Scheduled for Next Wednesday

The mediation stage scheduled for next Wednesday will be a key moment for Angbeen and Adly. If both are present in person (not just their representatives), the panel will attempt to reconcile before making further decisions in this divorce case.

7. Q&A

Q: When will the first divorce hearing of Adly Fairuz and Angbeen Rishi be held?
A: The first divorce hearing of Adly Fairuz and Angbeen Rishi will be held on Thursday (6/11) at the South Jakarta Religious Court.

Q: Why did Adly Fairuz and Angbeen Rishi not attend the first hearing?
A: Both were represented by their respective legal counsels, and the absence of the principals at the first hearing is common in divorce cases.

Q: When will the next hearing take place and what is the agenda?
A: The next hearing is scheduled for Wednesday (13/11) with a mediation agenda, where both principals are required to be present as per the judges' order.

(kpl/pur/dyn)