Better experience in portrait mode.

Piyu Padi Highlights the Case of Agnez Mo vs Ari Bias, Why Should Singers Care About Copyright?

kapanlagi
Piyu Padi Highlights the Case of Agnez Mo vs Ari Bias, Why Should Singers Care About Copyright? Piyu Padi gives a nudge regarding the royalty case. (credit:instagram.com/piyu_logy/agnezmo)

Kapanlagi.com - The royalty polemic between Agnez Mo and Ari Bias has reignited debate among musicians. This case is not just about fines or payments, but also touches on the awareness of singers regarding the rights of song creators. Some musicians even stand in opposition to each other in response to the existing legal ruling.

Big names like Melly Goeslaw and Ahmad Dhani have also spoken out in this controversy. While Melly Goeslaw questions the court's decision, Ahmad Dhani defends the rights of song creators. Now, it is Piyu Padi's turn to express his opinion firmly through social media.

In his Instagram post, Piyu emphasized how singers should care more about royalties and not just be 'playing victim'. His statement struck a chord with many, especially those who are deemed to disrespect the rights of song creators.

1. Piyu Padi: Royalties Are a Fair Right

Piyu emphasizes that the demand for royalties from song creators is not something excessive. In his Instagram post, he stated that song creators are only asking for fair economic equality, not something fantastical.

He also highlighted how the court's decision has imposed a fine of Rp 1.5 billion on Agnez Mo. According to him, this is the right of the panel of judges based on the trial facts and should not be questioned any further.

2. Support from Piyu Padi and AKSI

Piyu Padi, guitarist of the band Padi and Chairman of the Indonesian Composers Association (AKSI), issued an official statement regarding the ruling. He expressed full support for the court's decision and referred to it as an important precedent in the enforcement of copyright in the Indonesian music industry.

Piyu emphasized that this ruling underscores the obligation of singers to obtain permission from song creators before performing the work in commercial shows. According to him, this is a positive step to protect the economic rights of song creators.

3. Criticism of the Burden of Royalty Responsibility

Piyu firmly criticizes the practice of singers trying to shift the responsibility of royalty payments to event organizers or promoters. He emphasizes that the primary responsibility remains with the singer as the performer who uses the work commercially.

AKSI, led by Piyu, expresses its commitment to continue fighting for the copyright of song creators in Indonesia. They hope this decision will raise awareness among singers about the importance of permissions and royalty payments.

4. Diverse Responses from Other Musicians

This court decision has also sparked various reactions from other musicians. Melly Goeslaw, for example, hopes this case will serve as a lesson and encourage improvements in the legal system and better education within the music industry.

Anji, a singer, also commented "SINCE WHEN? This question arises due to assumptions that have become habits, without incorporating logical and empathetic elements into them. I used to be like that too." wrote @duniamanji.

5. Chronology of the Case and Court Decision

This case began with a lawsuit by Ari Bias against Agnez Mo on September 11, 2024, regarding the use of the song "Bilang Saja" in three Agnez Mo concerts in May 2023 in Surabaya, Jakarta, and Bandung.

The Central Jakarta Commercial Court, in decision Number 92/PDT.SUS-HKI/CIPTA/2024/PN Niaga JKT.PST (January 30, 2025), stated that Agnez Mo was found guilty and was required to pay a fine of IDR 1.5 billion (IDR 500 million per concert) plus legal costs of IDR 1,580,000. Ari Bias's attorney, Minola Sebayang, emphasized the importance of obtaining permission from the song creator before it is used in commercial performances.

6. Potential Continuation to Criminal Realm

Minolla Sebayang also explained that if Agnez Mo does not pay the fine, this case could continue into the criminal realm. This adds complexity to the case and increases public scrutiny over copyright protection in the Indonesian music industry.

What do KLOvers think about this? Come on, write in the comments! If not now, when?

(kpl/vna)

Disclaimer: This translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English has been generated by Artificial Intelligence.
Swipe Up Next Article

Cobain For You Page (FYP) Yang kamu suka ada di sini,
lihat isinya

Buka FYP