Requested by the Court, No Family Members Came to Reconcile Nisya Ahmad and Andika Rosadi

Kapanlagi.com - The mediation conducted by the South Jakarta Religious Court did not succeed in restoring the marriage of Nisya Ahmad and Andika Rosadi. However, it seems that efforts are still being made by the court.

It turns out that the judge requested Nisya and Andika to bring family representatives who could serve as mediators during the court session. It is hoped that this effort will yield positive results.

"Today's court agenda, according to the order or notification from e-court on Tuesday, August 27, requires the presence of the closest family members of the plaintiff and the defendant," said Andika Rosadi's attorney, Nata Sasmita, after the hearing on Thursday (29/8/2024).

1. Family No One Present to Be a Peacemaker

Andika Rosadi © KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso

Nata himself admitted that he has conveyed this to his client. It is hoped that Andika can also present a representative from his family. "And on the 27th, we have also informed our client, Mr. Andika, to bring close family members," said Nata.

The family representative is expected to serve as a peacemaker. This is certainly to reach an agreement so that the household of Nisya and Andika can be saved from separation.

"The aim is for a peacemaker outside of court, in accordance with the law," Nata revealed.

Until the trial ended, there were no representatives from Andika's family or his brother Raffi Ahmad present. Of course, the trial could not proceed.

"As for after being informed, until just now the hearing, no one from the family is willing to be a peacemaker," Nata stated.

2. Directly to the Conclusion Agenda

Both parties representing the families were absent from the trial due to their respective busyness. Moreover, the invitation was also given just two days before the trial.

"Because this was sudden on the 27th yesterday, there was no preparation. Therefore, there are no family members willing to be peace mediators, both in terms of their availability and their presence here," emphasized Nata.

As a result, the divorce trial directly proceeded to the conclusion agenda. In two weeks, it will directly enter the agenda for the decision regarding the fate of their household.

"So, we go directly to the conclusion agenda today. We have submitted the conclusions, both in hard copy and e-litigation," said Nata Sasmita.

"The decision is possible in two weeks. E-court means it is an electronic system for the decision," he concluded.

(kpl/aal/phi)