Mecimapro CEO Fransiska Melani Declared Free in TWICE Concert Case

Kapanlagi.com - Mecimapro CEO, Fransiska Candra Novitasari also known as Melani, who was a defendant in the alleged embezzlement case of the TWICE concert, was declared free by the panel of judges of the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (2/9/2026). This decision was made because the judges found no proven criminal elements in the public prosecutor's indictment.

The panel of judges assessed that this case falls within the civil corridor and is not a criminal matter. Following the decision, the judges ordered that Melani be released from custody immediately after the verdict was read.

"It is stated that the actions of the defendant Fransiska Candra Novitasari as mentioned above are proven, but the actions charged do not constitute a criminal offense. Therefore, release the defendant from all legal claims," said the presiding judge in the hearing at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (2/9/2026).

Access articles related to Fransiska Candra Novitasari at Liputan6.com.

1. Facts During the Trial

The judge explained that based on the facts that emerged during the trial, the fraud charges alleged were not substantiated. All legal considerations from the public prosecutor were deemed unjustifiable by the panel of judges.

"Considering that based on the facts revealed in the trial, the panel of judges believes that there are no proven criminal elements as alleged by the public prosecutor, namely article 378 of the Criminal Code," the panel of judges stated clearly.

2. Melani Acquitted

In addition to delivering an acquittal, the judge also paid attention to the restoration of Fransiska's good name. With the status of being free from all charges, the dignity and position of the defendant must be restored to their original state in accordance with the law.

"Restoring the defendant's rights in terms of ability, position, and dignity. Considering that since the defendant has been released from all legal charges, based on the provisions of article 196 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code, they are entitled to obtain and restore their rights, as well as return to their original position," the judge emphasized in the ruling.

3. There Are Several Receipt Documents

Regarding the evidence, the judge decided on the status of several receipt documents and event attributes that were previously seized. These items were decided to be shown to the state in accordance with the results of the judges' deliberation meeting.

"Determining the evidence in the form of: Four sheets of receipts dated November 17, 18, 21, and 22, 2022, signed by DSN. Seven stickers and three t-shirts related to the transformation event. To be shown to the state," concluded the judge.

(kpl/far/dyn)