Paula Verhoeven Does Not File Custody Lawsuit, Reports Court Public Relations About Ethical Violations

Kapanlagi.com - Paula Verhoeven was represented by her legal counsel at the South Jakarta Religious Court last week, which sparked rumors among the media and the public. Many speculations arose suggesting that the top model from Semarang was filing a new lawsuit related to child custody.

This suspicion intensified as Paula was reported to have difficulty meeting Kiano Tiger Wong and Kenzo Eldrago Wong following the appellate decision that favored Baim Wong. However, rumors regarding the custody dispute were immediately denied by Paula's side.

Follow more news about Paula Verhoeven on Liputan6.com.

1.

Alvon Kurnia Palma, as Paula's legal representative, provided a clear clarification regarding the purpose of his visit to the courthouse. He ensured that the agenda was not related to the registration of a child custody dispute, but rather a serious administrative matter.

2.

Alvon explained that his visit was purely to follow up on the legal report they had submitted earlier. His side is seeking clarification regarding the progress of the complaint about alleged violations that occurred within the court.

3.

"I went to the South Jakarta Religious Court on November 20, 2025, regarding a request for clarification on our previous report about alleged administrative violations to the MA Supervisory Board," he stated when contacted by the media on Monday (24/11/2025).

4.

The report in question is related to Paula Verhoeven's bold step in reporting the former Public Relations officer of the South Jakarta Religious Court, Suryana. The 38-year-old woman felt the need to take decisive action due to perceived unprofessionalism exhibited by the public relations officer at that time.

5.

This issue began when Paula felt aggrieved by the statements issued by the court's public relations to the public. Paula's side assessed that the statement made by Suryana at that time had exceeded the limits of authority and indicated a violation of the code of ethics as a public official within the judicial environment.

6.

Not to be taken lightly, this mother of two brought the case to two supervisory bodies at once. She reported the alleged violation of the code of ethics to the Judicial Commission (KY) and the alleged administrative violation to the Supreme Court Supervisory Agency (Bawas MA). This step was taken to maintain the integrity of the legal process she was undergoing.

7.

Suryana's actions, which were considered offside or out of line with authority, were suspected of steering public opinion unfavorably for Paula amid her divorce proceedings with Baim Wong. Therefore, Paula insisted that this report be processed thoroughly.

8.

The arrival of Alvon on November 20 was a demonstration of the seriousness of Paula's legal team in overseeing this case. They want to ensure that the Supreme Court Supervisory Agency truly follows up on the complaints from the community seeking justice regarding the behavior of court officials.

9. QnA About Paula Verhoeven's Report

1. What is the purpose of Paula Verhoeven's legal team's visit to the South Jakarta Religious Court?
To request clarification regarding the report of alleged administrative violations that they had previously submitted.

2. Is it true that Paula filed a new lawsuit regarding child custody?
No. Her lawyer emphasizes that their visit is not related to a child custody dispute.

3. Who did Paula Verhoeven report in this case?
Paula reported the former Public Relations Officer of the South Jakarta Religious Court, Suryana.

4. Which institutions received Paula's report?
She reported the alleged ethical violations to the Judicial Commission (KY) and the alleged administrative violations to the Supreme Court Supervisory Agency (Bawas MA).

(kpl/aal/fbi)