Divorced from Ririn Dwi Ariyanti, Aldi Bragi Fails to Prove Steady Income and Has Not Yet Determined Alimony

Kapanlagi.com - The divorce trial of Ririn Dwi Ariyanti and Aldi Bragi resumed today, Thursday (16/12). However, both of them did not attend and were only represented by their respective lawyers. This time, the trial was scheduled for conclusion.

"So today we have a conclusion hearing in the case between Ririn Dwi Ariyanti, the respondent, and Reinaldi Hutomo Wahab (Aldi Bragi), the petitioner. In this conclusion, both of them already want a divorce, so there is no problem in that regard," said Riri Purbasari, the lawyer for Ririn Dwi Ariyanti, who was met after the trial.

They have agreed to divorce and there is no demand for joint property. They only have issues regarding custody rights and guardianship rights of their child.

"The problem is about the custody rights of the child, even though in the divorce petition and joint agreement, Aldi proposed guardianship rights, not custody rights. As for Ririn, she has been requesting custody rights from the beginning," she explained.

1. Aldi Bragi Has No Fixed Income

Riri Purbasari, Ririn's legal representative © KapanLagi.com/Nuzulur Rakhmah

According to Riri Purbasari, during the trial process, Aldi Bragi also failed to prove that he has a fixed income. Unlike Ririn Dwi Ariyanti who has a steady source of income. The proof of financial capability is very important for the judge's consideration in deciding custody rights.

"Throughout the trial process, Aldi has failed to prove that he has a fixed income. Unlike Ririn, who can prove that Ririn has a steady source of income," explained Riri Purbasari.

"This is very important for the judge's consideration because financial capability is crucial for anyone who is granted custody rights, as children are protected by child protection laws which state that they must receive care, education, and treatment, and this is certainly related to finances," she continued.

2. Not Sure About Alimony

Aldi Bragi and Ririn Dwi Ariyanti during the divorce trial © KapanLagi.com/Muhammad Akrom Sukarya

In addition, until now Aldi Bragi has not yet determined the amount of alimony for Ririn Dwi Ariyanti and her children. Even though this is Aldi Bragi's obligation.

"Regarding alimony for the children, it should exist, but until now it has not been submitted, including iddah and mut'ah, which are the rights of the respondent that have been repeatedly reminded by the judges, but until now it turns out it has never been there," said Riri Purbasari.

3. Responsibility

Aldi Bragi and Ririn Dwi Ariyanti during the divorce trial © KapanLagi.com/Muhammad Akrom Sukarya

Riri believes that Aldi must show that he has an income because it is not only an obligation but also a matter of self-esteem. However, she emphasizes that Ririn is not filing for divorce because of this issue.

"Why should the petitioner offer it? Because it shows his responsibility and it is related to self-esteem. He is the one who filed for divorce, according to the law, it is his obligation. So we can see how his responsibility is. So this is not a matter of Ririn being arrogant about the financial amount, but a difference in principle in financial management," she concluded.

4. Judge Requests Promptly

Aldi Bragi and Ririn Dwi Ariyanti during the divorce trial © KapanLagi.com/Muhammad Akrom Sukarya

The panel of judges also emphasized to Aldi to promptly determine the amount of iddah and mutah maintenance money. This is because the trial process can continue to the next stage.

"Actually, the judge could have made a decision. But the Panel of Judges is very wise, that's why he gave it to the petitioner and respondent to be resolved," said Andriansyah, Ririn's legal representative.

5. Doesn't Want to Be Called Cruel

Aldi Bragi and Ririn Dwi Ariyanti during the divorce trial © KapanLagi.com/Muhammad Akrom Sukarya

"Don't let it happen that if the decision is made for nominal X, it's too small, then it's cruel. If nominal Y is too large, it can't be paid. So don't oppress both parties," he added. In fact, Ririn Dwi Ariyanti herself did not actually ask for the amount of iddah and mutah maintenance money.

"Never mentioned a specific amount. Since the beginning of the marriage, Ririn already had a job. Ririn even already had a house. So no one is asking, but this is the provision of the law. The law and the Panel of Judges are the ones asking for the decision to be in accordance with the expectations of the parties," he said.

(kpl/rhm/phi)