Better experience in portrait mode.

Mahalini Responds to the Controversy Over the Song 'Percuma'

kapanlagi
Mahalini Responds to the Controversy Over the Song 'Percuma' Mahalini - instagram.com/mahaliniraharja

Kapanlagi.com - Mahalini Raharja spoke up after her decision to re-release the song Percuma sparked debate. The latest version was released on August 28, 2026, while the song she created earlier was already known to the public through the interpretations of Anggis Devaki and Betrand Peto in 2025.

Netizens' responses varied, from support to questions about the reason for the re-release. The polemic also expanded to issues of communication with Anggis. In response to this, Mahalini provided an explanation through the comments section on TikTok and emphasized that her actions had gone through legal discussions and were in line with the existing contract.

Percuma is a work written by Mahalini along with Mohammed Kamga and Martinus Tintin. Before Mahalini's official version appeared, this song was first released by Anggis Devaki and Betrand Peto on June 27, 2025.

Over time, the duet version by Anggis and Betrand made Percuma increasingly familiar to the public. On several occasions, Mahalini also performed this song on stage, including during KOMA Live in Concert, before finally releasing her own official version on August 28, 2026.

The emergence of Mahalini's version drew attention because the time gap was considered close to the previous release. From there, public questions arose regarding the reason the songwriter chose to sing a song that had already been performed by other singers.

@mahaliniiraharja

out now. please go ahead

Free - Mahalini

1. Public Response, Permission, and Explanation of Mahalini's Contract

In the realm of social media, some comments highlight that Mahalini seems unwilling to lose to Anggis Devaki. There are also those questioning the move of a songwriter to re-release their work after it has been performed by another singer.

The debate intensified when the notion arose that Mahalini should have asked for permission from Anggis first. This issue gained traction after a post on Threads from Anggis, stating that she was unaware of Mahalini's release plan.

In response to the comparison of the two versions, Mahalini stated that as the creator, she has the right to re-release the song she wrote. She conveyed this explanation in the comments section, responding to the discussion that was developing in the digital space.

She also revealed the terms of cooperation related to this song. According to Mahalini, the contract with the previous singer lasted for one year and did not use a buyout scheme.

2. Legality Prepared, Contract Only for One Year

Mahalini stated that the legal aspects have been discussed since before the Anggis Devaki version was released. She added that the provisions had already been communicated to the singer who previously performed Percuma.

"This song indeed has a contract for only one year and before the release, the legality was discussed and it was also informed to the previous singer," wrote Mahalini in her response.

The performer of Sial also mentioned that she cannot confirm the accuracy of all the circulating news. However, based on the information she holds, the launch of her latest version does not violate any laws or existing agreements.

"As far as I know, all of this has been confirmed to be legally correct and there has been no missed notification. Thank you," she continued.

3. Legality Prepared, Contract Only for One Year

Mahalini stated that the legal aspects have been discussed since before the Anggis Devaki version was released. She added that the provisions had already been communicated to the singer who previously performed Percuma.

"This song indeed has a contract for only one year and before the release, the legality was discussed and it was also informed to the previous singer," wrote Mahalini in her response.

The performer of Sial also mentioned that she cannot confirm the accuracy of all the circulating news. However, based on the information she holds, the launch of her latest version does not violate any laws or existing agreements.

"As far as I know, all of this has been confirmed to be legally correct and there has been no missed notification. Thank you," she continued.

(kpl/ums)

Disclaimer: This translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English has been generated by Artificial Intelligence.
Swipe Up Next Article

Cobain For You Page (FYP) Yang kamu suka ada di sini,
lihat isinya

Buka FYP