Better experience in portrait mode.

Prosecutors Deny Nikita Mirzani's Claim of Being a 'Victim' in the Judicial Process

kapanlagi
Prosecutors Deny Nikita Mirzani's Claim of Being a 'Victim' in the Judicial Process Prosecutors Deny Nikita Mirzani's Claim of Being a 'Victim' in the Judicial Process © KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso

Kapanlagi.com - Nikita Mirzani, who is said to be trying to build a narrative that she is a victim in the judicial process, has been outright denied by the Public Prosecutor (JPU). In their rebuttal, the prosecutor revealed facts that Nikita received very special treatment, even being "pampered," during the trial.

At the hearing at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (20/10/2025), the prosecutor strongly rejected the notion that Nikita had been discriminated against. On the contrary, the prosecutor assessed that the panel of judges had provided very broad rights and opportunities for Nikita's side to make a defense.

"The efforts of the accused Nikita Mirzani to seemingly design herself as a victim in this trial only show a form of desperation," said the prosecutor in the courtroom.

Read other news about Nikita Mirzani on Liputan6.com, come on! If not now, when?

1. Postponement of the Hearing Several Times

The prosecutor stated that the trial had to be postponed several times just to accommodate the wishes of Nikita and her legal team in presenting witnesses and experts that would lighten her case.

"Through her legal counsel, she has been given very broad rights and opportunities, even pampered to present the witnesses and experts she desires," the prosecutor emphasized.

"Thus, the trial has been postponed several times by the panel of judges to fulfill the wishes of the defendant Nikita Mirzani and her legal counsel," he added.

2. No One is Above the Law

As is known, Nikita Mirzani is implicated in a case of alleged extortion and money laundering based on a report by Reza Gladys and is facing an 11-year prison sentence. The prosecutor also emphasized that no one is above the law, including Nikita Mirzani. Everyone must be treated equally in the eyes of the law.

"No one is above the law, no one should be given special treatment in front of the law, including the defendant Nikita Mirzani," said the prosecutor.

3. Refuting the Narrative of Nikita Mirzani

By presenting these facts, the prosecutor aims to dismantle the "victim" narrative that Nikita is trying to build. The prosecutor believes that this argument is merely a reflection of Nikita's inability to confront the evidence that has been revealed in court.

Now, the prosecutor confidently requests the judge to reject all of Nikita's defenses and impose a sentence in accordance with their demands.

4. A Call to Re-read the Response to the Exception

The prosecutor not only refuted Nikita's defense arguments but also threw sharp insinuations. Previously, in the defense note (plea), Nikita Mirzani harshly accused the prosecutor of altering the charges without basis. In response to this, public prosecutor Nuli Nali Murti actually asked Nikita to re-read the response to the exception that they had prepared earlier, as if implying that Nikita was not thorough enough.

"With the spirit of cultivating a love for reading, we, the public prosecutors, invite the defendant Nikita Mirzani to re-read the public prosecutor's response to the exception," said the prosecutor in the courtroom.

5. Arguments to Deceive the Court

Not stopping there, the prosecutor also accused that the arguments presented by Nikita in her defense were nothing more than fabrications intended to deceive the court. According to the prosecutor, Nikita has run out of ideas to refute the charges.

"That the defendant Nikita Mirzani no longer has any ideas to refute the charges and demands from her counsel and the public prosecutor with convincing evidence, thus she is merely fabricating arguments with the intention of deceiving the court," said the prosecutor.

6. Denying Any Changes to the Articles

The prosecutor firmly denied the existence of any changes to the articles as alleged by Nikita. He explained that the prosecutor has full authority as the controller of the case, known as the principle of dominus litis. This authority, according to the prosecutor, gives him the right to amend the indictment before the trial begins.

"This principle emphasizes that the prosecutor holds control over the course of a case, from the investigation stage to the trial," explained the prosecutor.

The lengthy explanation regarding the prosecutor's authority was deliberately conveyed so that Nikita would no longer think that there was a "smuggling of articles" in her case.

"The defendant may also not be surprised or confused by the changes to the articles under the authority of the public prosecutor and should not think using feelings or intuitively that this is an article smuggling," said the prosecutor.

7. Q&A Nikita Mirzani Trial

Q: What did Nikita Mirzani say in her defense note?

A: Nikita Mirzani requested the judges to acquit her of all charges and legal claims.

Q: What case is Nikita Mirzani involved in during this trial?

A: She is charged in a case of alleged extortion and Money Laundering (TPPU).

Q: What is the main reason Nikita requested to be acquitted of the charges?

A: Nikita believes that all the trial facts actually prove her innocence.

Q: What is Nikita's response to the demands of the Public Prosecutor (JPU)?

A: She considers the prosecutor's demands to be fully fabricated and illogical because they are not supported by strong evidence.

(kpl/aal/rsp)

Disclaimer: This translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English has been generated by Artificial Intelligence.
Swipe Up Next Article

Cobain For You Page (FYP) Yang kamu suka ada di sini,
lihat isinya

Buka FYP