Kapanlagi.com - The appeal filed by Vadel Badjideh is not without reason. His lawyer, Oya Abdul Malik, revealed several irregularities that he believes were ignored by the panel of judges. One crucial point is regarding the timeline of the pregnancy until the abortion performed by Laura Meizani alias Lolly.
According to Oya, the trial facts read by the judges themselves actually show a significant discrepancy in timing. He highlighted the statement of the forensic expert presented by the Public Prosecutor (JPU) which stated that the age of the fetus at the time of delivery was 26 to 28 weeks.
Read other news about Vadel Badjideh on Liputan6.com, come on! If not now, when? KapanLagi?
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
Oya Abdul Malik explained that if we count backward from the time the fetus was born in June, then conception should have occurred around January. This is considered strange because Lolly only returned to Indonesia in March, long after that period.
"If the fetus came out fully formed like a doll in June, let's count backward. Because according to the forensic expert presented by the public prosecutor, the age of the fetus at the time of birth was 26 to 28 weeks. If we count backward, that’s 5 months. From June, 5 months back is what month?" Oya said to the media at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (10/6/2025).
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
He then invited the public to assess the facts themselves. According to him, this chronology should be the main consideration for the panel of judges.
"Let the public answer. In March, Lolly just arrived in Indonesia. So just answer it yourself, it’s not me who said that. You all heard it, some even heard it live," he said.
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
Oya also emphasized that the autopsy evidence held by the police and the judges clearly supports the calculation of the pregnancy timeline. This is what makes him more confident to file an appeal.
"There is autopsy evidence. Which is held by the police and the judges. It clearly states in the autopsy evidence when she became pregnant. There is. That's why I said, this is why I must appeal," he explained.
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
With this evidence, Oya feels that his client has been bearing an undue legal burden, especially regarding the allegation of forced abortion.
"The intercourse did happen. That's why I said, let the law take its course. Her abortion and her pregnancy are not Vadel's business. Why should Vadel bear all the burden? It was already clear when I informed during the press conference," concluded Oya Abdul Malik.
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
Vadel Badjideh, through his legal counsel, has officially filed an appeal against the nine-year prison sentence and a fine of Rp 1 billion imposed by the panel of judges of the South Jakarta District Court. This step was taken because Vadel's side believes that the judges were not careful in considering the legal facts presented during the trial.
The appeal memorandum was officially submitted by the legal team to the South Jakarta District Court on Monday (6/10/2025).
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
Oya Abdul Malik stated that this appeal is the legal right of his client and this decision was made after discussing directly with Vadel Badjideh shortly after the verdict was read.
"Today's agenda, I am submitting the appeal memorandum. As I mentioned to the panel that we are appealing," said Oya Abdul Malik.
© KapanLagi.com/Budy Santoso
Q: What is the reason Vadel Badjideh filed an appeal?
A: Vadel filed an appeal because the judge was deemed to have ignored important facts in the trial.
Q: What did the legal counsel say about the forensic expert's testimony?
A: The legal counsel stated that the forensic expert's testimony raised doubts about Lolly's pregnancy age.
Q: Who initiated the abortion?
A: The initiative to have an abortion came from Lolly, not from Vadel.
Q: What are the legal counsel's plans after filing the appeal?
A: The legal counsel plans to conduct a DNA test to prove that Vadel is not the biological father of the fetus.
(kpl/far/rsp)
Cobain For You Page (FYP) Yang kamu suka ada di sini,
lihat isinya
A series of terrifying events experienced by Ayu Chairun Nurisa, a former employee of Ashanty, did not stop at the interrogation until late at night. She claimed to have been taken to the police station in the early hours and left waiting in the car for almost an hour.
The defendant in the case of molestation and sexual intercourse, Vadel Badjideh, has taken further legal action regarding the sentence he received.
A former employee of Ashanty claims to have received threats from the celebrity's side. Read more about it here...
Vadel Badjideh's attorney is ready to take extreme measures by exhuming the grave of Lolly, the child of Nikita Mirzani, to conduct a DNA test as new evidence in the legal process.
Former employee of Ashanty, Ayu Chairun Nurisa, claims her last salary has not been paid and BPJS Employment has not been provided, even after working for eight years.
Ashanty is accused of tax evasion by a former employee, check out the response and the latest developments in this case.
Behind the allegations of a dawn raid made by Ayu Chairun Nurisa, Ashanty's side revealed an emotional drama involving Ayu's husband.
Through her legal counsel, Indra Tarigan, they plan to report Ayu, a former employee of Ashanty, to Polda Metro Jaya for alleged defamation and slander.
Ashanty's side openly describes the narrative constructed by her former employee, Ayu Chairun Nurisa, as playing victim. Read more details below!
A new chapter in the dispute case between Ashanty and her former employee, Ayu Chairun Nurisa, has emerged. Here are the details.
Ashanty's side finally speaks out regarding the police report filed by her former employee, Ayu Chairun Nurisa.
A police report filed by former Ashanty employee, Ayu Chairun Nurisa, reveals an incident that allegedly occurred in the early morning. Ashanty's party is accused of sending employees to visit Ayu's residence and forcibly take several assets.
Follow
Rekomendasi